Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History
Many companies have been bankrupt because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by the victims. A mesothelioma attorney can help you get compensation.
Health experts and doctors have long warned of asbestos exposure's dangers. Industry leaders have downplayed the risks. In time the number of people who were diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses.
The Third Case
Asbestos litigation began to take off in the 1970s, shortly after research studies began to link asbestos to severe illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Tens of thousands of suits were filed due to the fact that asbestos-related diseases rarely show symptoms for decades after exposure. These lawsuits were filed in Texas due to its favorable laws.
One of the most important cases that shaped asbestos litigation was Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos products in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was brought to be known that the company's chief executive Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. In his deposition, Brown admitted to being heavily affected by Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd was a physician who was who was known for his smug disregard for the health of employees was a well-known character.
The evidence revealed that Johns asbestos lawyer lawsuit Manville knew about the asbestos dangers but did nothing to protect its employees. The court ruled that the company was responsible for the injuries suffered by workers who later developed mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. The court also determined that the company was responsible for the families of deceased workers.
After the ruling in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that made use of asbestos as a material. Most of these claims were denied due to a variety of reasons. Certain cases were allowed continue, and the courts developed a set of guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related suits.
In the 1990s, asbestos defendants continued to seek legal rulings to limit their liability. For example they wanted to be able to argue that the asbestos materials were not part of their product and therefore should not be held liable for injuries to people who worked with asbestos. These arguments were not successful and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the "asbestos products" defense.
Today, a mesothelioma patient's right to seek compensation from responsible parties in a case is protected by federal and state law. Insurance companies continue to fight against these claims.